Hmm, this is a sticky situation. A guy works at a company and sets up a Twitter account promoting the company.
Then he leaves the company, but changes the name of the Twitter account. All the followers remain. So the question is; If the company considered the account their property, why did they let him leave with it? If they were smart, they would have kept the account.
I hope the judge has no clue about Twitter. The trial will have his/her head spinning. What an education.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16338040
-
Then he leaves the company, but changes the name of the Twitter account. All the followers remain. So the question is; If the company considered the account their property, why did they let him leave with it? If they were smart, they would have kept the account.
I hope the judge has no clue about Twitter. The trial will have his/her head spinning. What an education.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16338040
No comments:
Post a Comment
Drop me a note..